Reference Frames

Everything needs an initial reference frame. Every idea/principle. It’s not that everything should be given an initial reference frame. It’s that nothing can be thought of without one. Again, not that a given idea doesn't exist without a reference frame, but that without the initial reference frame the idea simply couldn't be thought of. It couldn't be an idea or be imagined. Everything that enters the mind should have reference frame. But reference frames can be misinterpreted which allows for some literally unthinkable ideas. This happens when ideas are built off “ideas” beyond the actual initial reference frame. An idea of an “idea”. This latter idea often times looks to be rational and may fit very well with the order of things. The initial “idea” however, has not been considered. But once considered it can become evident that the initial idea is actually unimaginable  It cannot be thought of. It’s an “idea” or reference frame which has been misinterpreted in order to come to later conclusions. Misinterpreted in the sense that it should not have been interpreted to begin with. This might seem impossible since the brain cannot think of things which it cannot think of, clearly. But if the later conclusions are appealing enough intellectually or emotionally there can be a misinterpretation of unknown reference frames. The known becomes intertwined with the unknown and eventually the entire idea becomes seemingly plausible. These misinterpretations are usually difficult to recognize especially within widespread ideas. Whether the “idea” is plausible or not is irrelevant since it is not an actual idea. The correct conclusion once realizing the nature of the nonsense of the “idea” is to conclude that all proceeding ideas are also nonsensical. Again, not that they don’t have substance or that they don’t exist. That wouldn't mean anything. Anything can exist. Only a few things can be thought of, in proportion to that which can exist. But yeah, these “ideas” cannot be thought of as ideas. When I encounter these ideas I tend to ask the question, “What does that mean?” The answer is never satisfactory because of either blindness to this entire concept or misinterpretation of my question. Need a better approach.